BooHaHa full of frights and delights - The fate of gay marriage is up to yous
"That's right," came the chorus from 37 people as a Baptist
preacher said gay marriage needs to be outlawed.
"Amen," was the next refrain.
It wasn't church, but it was religion and politics mixed into medicine
they want you to take.
For the all-male pastors of several area churches and a few all-male
Republican politicians, the only subject Tuesday at a news conference
at the York Baptist Association was that South Carolina needs a
constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and
one woman.
I counted 33 whites, three blacks and one Korean. All the people
in an arc behind standard bearer the Rev. Steve Hogg of Rock Hill's
First Baptist Church stood shoulder to shoulder to urge people to
vote "yes" on a statewide referendum question Tuesday
that would make marriage legally only between one man and one woman.
A ballot question that almost everybody agrees will pass easily
anyway.
The question, though, is why?
Why is it so important to spread the word that the state constitution
must be changed, when there is no assemblage of gays to line up
and get married here?
The words "traditional culture" or "traditional
values" were said three times by different speakers. To save
the crumbling family from further destruction, they said, and protect
South Carolina from liberal courts.
If South Carolina and the other seven states with marriage amendments
on Tuesday's ballot pass those measures, a majority of U.S. states
will have constitutions saying marriage is only between a man and
a woman, said state Rep. Greg Delleney, R-Chester. South Carolina
needs to get with the majority, he said.
"The Supreme Court is not immune to public pressure,"
said Delleney, a lawyer by trade. "This boils down to whether
we want to save our traditional culture."
So there it is: Strike now. Supporters say before the Supreme Court
gets a chance to decide if denying gay marriage is discrimination,
you the voter need to send a warning shot across the bow.
The Rev. Dave Stanford of Clover, current moderator of the Baptist
association with "65 churches and 22,000 believers," put
it bluntly that homosexual marriage could lead to the "destruction
of society."
Does society hang in the balance over whether the gay couple down
the street wants to get married?
These men, not a Democrat and not a woman among them on Tuesday,
said yes, gay marriage means that much.
It is tough to argue against these people who gathered Tuesday,
who clearly care about their community, who have the courage to
publicly say so. All want children to grow up and thrive and prosper
in two-parent families with a lady called Mom and a man called Dad.
Still, Tuesday's news conference was also an attempt to show who
has political muscle. Who can reach the voters and bring them out.
The preachers flexed powerful biceps Tuesday.
Hogg, a respected religious leader in York County for years who
has fought conservative fights, said he will consider any politician's
stance on the gay marriage amendment when deciding who to vote for
Tuesday.
Tuesday, we elect a governor and other statewide offices, state
representatives, county council members, school boards.
Tuesday, a person alone at the ballot box decides who to vote for,
what amendments to back, and whether a candidate and a position
on gay marriage are connected.
You the voter will say if South Carolina is threatened by gay marriage,
before any court decides if gay marriage is discrimination.
You decide whether to say, "Amen." |